Poison Pero is RIGHT!

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D - Ohio)

"As a nation, you know, I, I , I, I look back at history and some of the worst governments we've ever had, you know one of the first things they did?  They went after the trade unions.  Hitler didn't want unions, Stalin didn't want unions, Mubarak didn't want independent unions.  These, these autocrats in history don't want independent unions.  So when I see, when I see in Egypt, or if I see in, in the old Soviet Russia, or I see - history tells me about Germany - I, I, I'm not, I'm not comparing what's happening to the workers in Madison (Wisconsin) or in Columbus (Ohio) to Hitler and Stalin, but I'm saying that history teaches us that unions are a very positive force in society that creates a middle class and that protects our freedom."

I feel for people who have speech impediments of any kind.  It has to be terribly frustrating and difficult...That said, Sen. Brown doesn't have a speech impediment, and "I, I, I, I", I'm afraid he knows perfectly well what he's saying is a load of poo poo.  Which is why he could barely get out an intelligible or intelligent sentence in his screed against the Governors of Ohio and Wisconsin.

His own 'BS Detector' was trying to 'impede' him from saying something completely stupid...But it failed.

Also, I love it when people say stuff like 'I, I, I'm not comparing someone to Hitler or Stalin, but I, I, I'm comparing someone to Hitler or Stalin.'

Have some balls, and say what you mean!  If you want to compare people to Hitler and Stalin, just do it, and stand behind your comment...And if your comment is completely absurd, which most comparisons to these monsters are, take the lumps you deserve for being an ignoramus.

To set the fact straight, it's also important to know Governors Walker, Kaisich and Christie (New Jersey) haven't banned any unions at all.  The private sector unions haven't been touched in the slightest, and the public sector unions have simply been forced to get more in line with the economic and financial realities of their states...No one's been forced out of their union, no one's been sent to a gulag or death camp.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Governor Brian Schweitzer (D - Montana)

"(Women) are not great fans of polygamy, 86 percent were not great fans of polygamy.  I am not alleging by any stretch that Romney is a polygamist and approves of (the) polygamy lifestyle, but his father was born into (a) polygamy commune in Mexico."

Shut the front door!  Mitt Romney's grandfather was a radical Mormon with multiple wives, and Mitt's father was born in a Third World Country?  That's the last straw; I'm voting for Bara.....

"(Obama's) great-grandfather, Obama Opiyo, had five wives, including two who were sisters.  His grandfather, Hussein Onyango, had at least four wives, one of whom, Akuma, gave birth to the president's father, Barack Obama, before fleeing her abusive husband.  Obama Sr. was already married when he left Kenya to study at the University of Hawaii, where he married again.  His American wife-to-be, Stanley Ann Dunham, was not yet 18 and unaware of his marital situation when she became pregnant with his namesake son in 1961." - Washington Post

Lets be real, no one should care how many wives or bastard children Mitt Romney and Barack Obama's grandparents had.  I also don't care if their families are from Kenya or Mexico.  And what's the big deal if Barack ate the cousins of the animals Mitt carried on the roof of his car?  - Sen. McCain is worried his son's bulldog might be on Obama's menu, however. - These asinine details have absolutely nothing to do with the 2012 Election.

So, what are the details of the Election we need to think about?  Barack Obama is a LeftyMitt Romney is not.  Those are the only details we need to bother with...I don't care if Mitt's grandparents, or even his parents, were polygamist nut jobs or came from Mars.

Truth be told I wouldn't care if Mitt and Ann had kinky sheep and goat banging marriage rituals...It would take much more than this to get me to vote for Barack Obama or any of his Lefty pals.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Marion Barry (Washington D.C. City Council - Crack Junkie)

"We've got to do something about these Asians coming in, opening up business - those dirty shops.  They ought to go...I'll just say right now, you know.  But we need African-American businesspeople to be able to take their places, too."

WOW!  No, not that Barry is committing Minority-on-Minority Crime - that wouldn't be news to anyone.  What's amazing is Marion Barry is still alive and kicking in the Democrat Party establishment...Which says much less about Barry than Democrats.

In case you've forgot:  Marion Barry was Mayor of Washington D.C., until he was caught on tape smoking crack cocaine.  I guess this hasn't been a problem for the Democrat leadership, however, and Barry sees it as nothing but a conspiracy:

"The biggest challenge I've overcome is the FBI setting me up...People in Washington understood what they were trying to do."

In perfect Liberal stride, instead of accepting that he was a crackhead Barry went on the offensive against those who caught him, and threw in an accusation of his own against them.

Oh well, lets get one more quote from the ex-mayor about what he's up to these days:

"I'm doing God's work.  I have made public service my ministry.  God gave me a great brain, courage, charisma, vision and the kinds of things that make leaders."

Barry truly is an example of the old saying:  "Tis strange - but true; for truth is always strange; Stranger than fiction." - Lord Byron

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Hilary Rosen (Warrior Against Motherly Women)

"His wife has actually never worked a day in her life."

- Commenting on what a general POS Mitt Romney's wife, Ann, is for not working and choosing to be a stay-at-home-mother.

Yes!  You go, Sister Hilary!  Keep waging war on women.  You radical, Rightwing, Republican, you!

What, this skank isn't a Righty?  Surely you jest that she's on the Democrat payroll and has been to the White House visiting Team Obama dozens of times?

Boys, feel free to skip out on the rest of my comment, because it will be middle-class women who decide the 2012 Election...So ladies, are you going to fall for the Liberal meme about Republicans hating women?  Taking away abortions, throwing granny over the cliff, starving children, etc.?  Or are you going to open your eyes to the reality that the United States has functioned under Liberal policies for at least five decades, and if women aren't where they want to be societally and economically it's because these Liberal policies have failed our country?

The problem isn't too little Liberalism; the problem is too much Liberalism!

If you're honest, you know these policies haven't bettered women or the family, and have done little other than bring women down to the level of men...If you pay attention, you also know Democrats aren't all they're cracked up to be (click the link):

Women Paid Significantly Less in Obama White House Than Their Male Counterparts

If you're shocked, you shouldn't be.  And you wouldn't be if you'd allow yourself to get past the propaganda you've always heard about Democrats supporting the poor, minorities and women.

Ladies, you will determine the 2012 Election.  You will decide the fate of our nation...Do you want to continue turning Left on the bankrupt road we are on (morally and financially), or do you think after five failed decades of this insanity it might be time to try a different (Rightward) path?

Oh, and I pray the Left continues hitting on Ann Romney, because this Harvard graduate - not exactly a doltish woman following at her husband's heals - can more than hold her own.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Sandy 'Sheep Shearer' Sheedy (Sacramento City Council)

"There's been a lot of people that have been shot by an unloaded gun."

- Campaigning to 'disarm' Californians, who are allowed to carry unloaded handguns.

Wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...What?  How in the world are guns shooting any people, let alone "a lot of people", when they are "unloaded"?

By definition a gun which is "unloaded" - no bullets in the magazine or chamber(s) - can't 'shoot' anything or anyone.  What am I missing here?  Why am I unable to comprehend this woman's assault on the laws of physics?

I've got it.  I make the mistake of living in reality; a cruel world where facts and truth dominate over fairy dust and good feelings...As such, I'm incapable of understanding the world of make-believe where Liberal turds say anything - with or without logic - and expect the general population to simply shake their heads in agreement.  A world where the sheep follow.  And it's not a shepherd they follow but a sheep shearer who fleeces them physically, emotionally, logically, and financially.

Oh, and the sheep shearers aren't exactly what they seem, either.  When they pull back the mask they are actually wolves; wolves who refuse to allow the sheep to be armed:

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.  Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

Sunday, April 08, 2012

Rose Supper Club

"There will be 'free shots at the door.'"

- Part of an advertisement for a Montgomery, Alabama club.

YES!!  I love shots; Jack, vodka, Jager, tequila, apple puckers, I'm not too picky.  Especially when it comes to "free shots"...I mean, what a rare treat to be given "free shots."  Usually I have to take advantage of a a young fella like Eric to get "free shots" (inside joke).

There has to be a pretty high cover charge to get "free shots", right?  Probably $25 or so, and as part of the cover you get a "free shot at the door."

Wrong!  On April 6th, the Rose Supper Club was offering "free shots at the door" in honor of what they called "Food Stamp Friday"...There was a $5 cover, but the kicker to get the "free shots" was you had to present your food stamp card at the door.

That's right, bring your food stamp card, join the Supper Club for "Food Stamp Friday" and get a "free shot at the door."

I wonder if the patrons also had to present a photo ID proving they were old enough to drink?  Nah.  That would be too difficult for the Food Stampers, and could be perceived as discrimination...Which could lead to Attorney General Holder coming down on the bar, because asking for food stamps cards is one thing, but asking for a photo ID is entirely over the top.

WAIT A MINUTE!  I think I have a compromise on the voter ID problem:  Don't require people bring their driver's license to the voting booth, simply require them to show their food stamp card...This would be absolute proof they are Americans in the Age of Obama!

Thursday, April 05, 2012

Barack Obama (Demonizer-in-Chief)

"Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress."

Obama's doing what he does best:  Going on the offensive in an effort to demonize and destroy those who oppose his version of 'democratic tyranny'.

He knows the Court is going to strike down ObamaCare - Justice Kagan has probably already leaked the results or he wouldn't be starting his offensive yet - and now he's going to do his best to try and illegitimize the Supreme Court...Incredibly, Obama and his lackeys are going to cry and whine about 'judicial activism'; usually a favorite Liberal tool of subverting the will of the people.

Funny thing is if the Democrats would have passed a bill with a "strong majority of a democratically elected Congress" it would have been acceptable to the American people and Obama would be reaping the reward of being a uniter...Instead he is the ultimate divider, and the Democrats jammed through a ridiculous bill with a disgraceful process of buying and selling votes and made no attempt to include half the Congress; passing it without any Republican support.

Hell, they passed it without support from most of the American people, which is why they got crushed in the 2010 Election...This won't be why the SCOTUS rejects ObamaCare, however.  They're going to reject it because it doesn't meet constitutional muster; a fact Pelosi, Reid and Obama knew they'd be up against, but decided it was worth pushing though anyway.

Don't take it from me, however:

"In Marbury (vs. Madison) in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall laid down the doctrine of judicial review.  In the 209 years since, the Supreme Court has invalidated part or all of countless laws on grounds that they violated the Constitution. All of those laws were passed by a ‘democratically elected’ legislature of some kind, either Congress or in one of the states. And no doubt many of them were passed by ‘strong’ majorities.” - Wall St. Journal

Of course Obama knows this, but he'll stop at nothing when it comes to performing his duties as Demonizer-in-Chief.


Tuesday, April 03, 2012

State Rep. Babette Josephs (D - Pennsylvania)

"What are they?  Women, or are they men with breasts?...I don't believe they're real women...I believe they're men with breasts."

- Commenting on other female state legislators who support a bill giving women a chance to see an ultrasound prior to aborting their child.

Ooooooooooh myyyyyyyyyyyy Gooooooooooooooooood!

What is wrong with "men with breasts"?  I fully expect to see the LGBT crowd protesting this insensitive remark.  How dare she rip on trannys!?!?!

Maybe they can call in Sharpton to help lead the chant:

"Hey-hey, ho-ho, this anti-'men with breasts' skank has gotta go.  Hey-hey, ho-ho!"

I wonder if she also has a problem with women with penises?  Probably not.

That's all.
    NOTE: The editorial content of this blog is the property of the Blog Owner......Feel free to quote from the editorial content, but please give proper credit and linking.